Adr 001 Plugin Architecture
Microservices frameworks need to support multiple infrastructure backends (registries, brokers, transports, stores). Different teams have different preferences and existing infrastructure.
Status
Accepted
Context
Microservices frameworks need to support multiple infrastructure backends (registries, brokers, transports, stores). Different teams have different preferences and existing infrastructure.
Hard-coding specific implementations:
- Limits framework adoption
- Forces migration of existing infrastructure
- Prevents innovation and experimentation
Decision
Go Micro uses a pluggable architecture where:
- Core interfaces define contracts (Registry, Broker, Transport, Store, etc.)
- Multiple implementations live in the same repository under interface directories
- Plugins are imported directly and passed via options
- Default implementations work without any infrastructure
Structure
go-micro/
├── registry/ # Interface definition
│ ├── registry.go
│ ├── mdns.go # Default implementation
│ ├── consul/ # Plugin
│ ├── etcd/ # Plugin
│ └── nats/ # Plugin
├── broker/
├── transport/
└── store/
Consequences
Positive
- No version hell: Plugins versioned with core framework
- Discovery: Users browse available plugins in same repo
- Consistency: All plugins follow same patterns
- Testing: Plugins tested together
- Zero config: Default implementations require no setup
Negative
- Repo size: More code in one repository
- Plugin maintenance: Core team responsible for plugin quality
- Breaking changes: Harder to evolve individual plugins independently
Neutral
- Plugins can be extracted to separate repos if they grow complex
- Community can contribute plugins via PR
- Plugin-specific issues easier to triage
Alternatives Considered
Separate Plugin Repositories
Used by go-kit and other frameworks. Rejected because:
- Version compatibility becomes user’s problem
- Discovery requires documentation
- Testing integration harder
- Splitting community
Single Implementation
Like standard net/http. Rejected because:
- Forces infrastructure choices
- Limits adoption
- Can’t leverage existing infrastructure
Dynamic Plugin Loading
Using Go plugins or external processes. Rejected because:
- Complexity for users
- Compatibility issues
- Performance overhead
- Debugging difficulty
Related
- ADR-002: Interface-First Design (planned)
- ADR-005: Registry Plugin Scope (planned)
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Glad to hear it! Please tell us how we can improve.
Sorry to hear that. Please tell us how we can improve.